Not sure how you’re seeing such a high ratio; I tried the same commands on my
system (thanks for these btw) and my savings from compression are around 5% =D
That said I’m dealing with a much smaller volume (3gb) and I’ve only identified
a half dozen or so attachments that don’t have some kind of compression
already; most modern mail programs will compress common types like images by
default, and many modern file-formats have compression built in, and can give
better results than zlib anyway.
My biggest savings are on mailing list messages (I filter these into their own
mailbox) since they tend to be longer than typical messages, especially with
auto-quoting, they also tend to be very busy mailboxes, but I also don’t keep
them forever.
As an experiment I also tried moving my (uncompressed) messages to a
compressing file-system (ZFS using lz4) but the savings were similarly small; I
assume they were probably a bit better, but the extra overhead of the
file-system eroded it since the savings are so small in my case. I think if
you’re serious about compression then a compressing file-system is the way to
go though, but in my case I’m on virtual hosting so there’s not much point in
layering a ZFS volume on top of shared storage (since it’s ZFS based already
for integrity/redundancy).
I just thought I’d mention my experience since people are quoting big savings
that I haven’t seen; I wouldn’t consider my usage all that unusual, maybe some
of you are receiving a lot more newsletter type traffic (these messages can be
quite large), uncompressed document type files, or are less selective in which
messages are retained forever? Just a caution that people looking at
compression may not see the same savings depending upon their actual content.
Spam is another bad category for compression I’ve found; at least in my case
the messages are usually very short, and/or contain randomised junk to try to
confound filters, though I’m pretty aggressive about clearing them (I discard
messages outright above a certain threshold, and use a script to expunge spam
messages so that I can expunge messages with higher spam ratings faster (so
possible false positives stick around longer so they can be caught).
> On 16 Mar 2016, at 09:48, Harald Leithner <leith...@itronic.at> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> use "doveadm" to get all real message
>
> doveadm -f table fetch -A "size.physical" ALL | awk
> '{s+=$2}END{printf("%.2fMB\n", s/1024/1024);}'
>
> 189247.67MB .. 185G
>
> use "du" to get size on disc:
>
> In my case
> with deduplication:
>
> /srv/stroage/# du -s -h *
> 53G vmail
> 75G vmail_sis
>
> without deduplication
>
> /srv/stroage/# du -s -h -l *
> 53G vmail
> 209G vmail_sis
>
> j4i, SIS can't use the zlib plugin so the 75G in my case are not compressed
> (I haven't a filesystem that I trust and has a compression feature). Anyway
> it has a 3:1 ratio in my case.
>
> Maybe I interpret the SIS wrong and SIS couldn't be counted with du -l (count
> links).
>
> But if someone doesn't have SIS this values should be point you into the
> right direction.
>
> bye
>
> Harald
>
> Am 16.03.2016 um 08:50 schrieb Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator:
>> Am 15.03.16 um 16:01 schrieb Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which
>>> shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used?
>>>
>>> Something that shows the uncompressed size vrs. the compressed.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> maybe my question was a bit misleading. But anyway thanks for your
>> feedback regarding your experiences and compression rates.
>>
>> We already thought about the benefit of less IO and more CPU power,
>> which is no concern.
>>
>> The mailboxes I checked also go with 40-60% compression rate.
>>
>> But what I was looking for was a tool or way to see what volume would be
>> used if we where not using compression.
>>
>> e.g. "du -hs --without-zlib"
>>
>> Our management would like to see a graph one day which shows the volume
>> uncompressed and compressed ...
>>
>> Adding zlib with mdbox or maildir - as we do it currently - is from my
>> POV if you have the CPU power a MUST :)
>>
>> happy dovecoting - Götz
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Harald Leithner
>
> ITronic
> Wiedner Hauptstraße 120/5.1, 1050 Wien, Austria
> Tel: +43-1-545 0 604
> Mobil: +43-699-123 78 4 78
> Mail: leith...@itronic.at | itronic.at
