Hi Jake,

thanks for fixing this. I have installed now the newly built package on
my production system and will report, if any more core dumps occur.

Regards,
Andreas

Am 31.08.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Jake Goerzen:
> Hi Andreas & Timo,
> 
> 
>   I've found out what is causing the incorrect hash in the built
> packages.  Our build system use here at OpenCSW has internal git
> patching capability.  I disabled it and rebuild again.  This time all
> architectures and memory model's are reporting the correct git-commit
> hash 7be1766.  Thank you Andreas for noticing and reporting this.
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Jake
> 
> 
> On 08/31/2016 06:17 AM, Piper Andreas wrote:
>> Hello Timo,
>>
>> from the maintainer of the OpenCSW package I got the below answer.
>>
>> As the newly build package yields another different commit hash (which I
>> cannot find on GitHub too), I would ask, if you are sure that the commit
>> hash-output in 'doveconf -n' is generated correctly?
>>
>> The headline of 'doveconf -n' with the newly build package is
>> # 2.2.25 (68082dc): /etc/opt/csw/dovecot/dovecot.conf
>>
>> Many thanks for your help,
>> Andreas
>>
>> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
>> Betreff: Re: OpenCSW question about package CSWdovecot
>> Datum: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:56:44 -0700
>> Von: jgoerzen <jgoer...@opencsw.org>
>> An: pi...@hrz.uni-marburg.de
>>
>> Hello Andreas,
>>
>>
>>     The OpenCSW dovecot package was built using the 2.2.25 version
>> release tarball.  No code changes or patches have been applied. I'm not
>> sure what happened.  I will respin new packages and then check to see if
>> the git-commit hash is correct.  When the packages are done building
>> I'll put them in the experimental catalog:
>>
>>
>> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#jgoerzen
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jake
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/29/2016 11:59 PM, pi...@hrz.uni-marburg.de wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> with your newest dovecot-package 2.2.25,REV=2016.07.01, I sometimes
>>> get core-dumps as documented in my bug-report at the
>>> dovecot-mailing-list:
>>> http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-August/105321.html
>>> In reaction to my bug-report, Timo Sirainen asks, which git-commit of
>>> the dovecot-sources was used for this package:
>>> http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-August/105332.html
>>>
>>> Could you shed some light on this?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot,
>>> Andreas
>>
> 




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to