On 10/10/2016 17:29, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 10-10-2016 om 17:16 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 10-10-2016 om 14:39 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Does your build end at some particular point?
See **** DETAILS **** for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report.
Aki
I would guess this is not "c99" way...
It seems to fail on a C99 feature called Compound Literal (see
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf, Section
6.5.2.5).
It should be supported by AIX:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGH3R_13.1.3/com.ibm.xlcpp1313.aix.doc/language_ref/compound_literals.html
I have no idea why it would fail here.
Regards,
Stephan.
Well, if I had the budget to buy the latest version (version 13 is
your doclink) - then maybe it would work for me. I do not have the
resources to upgrade from v11. Sad day for me I guess.
Or lucky for me that "Compound Literal" is not used much - this is
the first time I have run into it.
Well, older versions are supposed to support it too:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGH3R_11.1.0/com.ibm.xlcpp111.aix.doc/language_ref/compound_literals.html
Regards,
Stephan.
I am trying to work on it. Hard to read until you know what you are
looking at.
I had already seen that 11.1 also shows the link - I guess it does not
like the nested form.
And, it looks as if you have too many {} pairs (one too many outside
pairs) - the .info report was mentioning they were more than needed and
'skipping' iirc.
