and the first line of the diff is : < this file, see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml. ---
this file, see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml.
38c38
< <luceneMatchVersion>6.4.1</luceneMatchVersion>
---
<luceneMatchVersion>7.5.0</luceneMatchVersion>

So, are you running 6.4.1 or 7.5.0 ????
On 2019-01-02 08:12, Joan Moreau wrote:

The real main differecne seems coming from "diffconfig.xml" When I put yours, Solr delete (!) schema.xml and create a "manage-schema" and starts complaining about useless types (tdates, booleans, etc..) that are not needed for Mail fileds When I put mine (from standard distribution of Arch), it keeps things as they are (yeah !), does not complains about those useless types and startup properly. I attach my diffconfig But these are the configurations that one should adjust as per his/her own use. The main problem is : After some time of indexing from Dovecot, Dovecot returns errors (invalid SID, etc...) and Solr return "out of range indexes" errors On 2019-01-02 07:49, Joan Moreau wrote: Hi Solr is a standard package in ArchLinux. ("pacman -S solr") . the systemd installation script is included (and it is launching /opt/solr/bin/solr.in.sh) Instance : sudo -u solr /opt/solr/bin/solr create -c dovecot -> this creates a separate folder with default solrconfig.xml, schema.xml, etc.. I made a symlink of the data folder to a second drive (ext4) much bigger On 2018-12-31 14:09, Daniel Miller wrote: On 12/29/2018 4:49 PM, Joan Moreau wrote: Also :

- Java is 10.0.2

Same as me. - If i delete schema.xml but create only managed-schema, the solr refuses to start with a java error "schema.xml missing"

Ok...so we need to do some more digging.

How did you install Solr? (I downloaded a "binary" installation and unpacked it)

How did you create the dovecot instance?  (I've provided explicit instructions 
for how I did it - did you follow those exactly or something different)?

How are you starting Solr?  (I use the provided "solr/bin/solr start" command, 
wrapped inside a systemd service).

--
Daniel

Reply via email to