Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Do 25 Feb 2021 12:17:55 CET): > > I'm not sure about the semantics of setpwent()/endpwent(), mayb the nss > plugin (here sssd) should gracefully handle a missing endwent() if it > sees a new setpwent(). But I think, it can't harm to call endpwent() on > the dovecot side. > > I deployed a debian package with the above patch added onto my system, > and it seems to work.
I added a small patch to the sssd nss module, preventivly calling its internal endpwent() function, prior to setpwent(). This way I achive the same result, the user's list ist complete now. So, IMHO the bottom line is: it's not clear if a successive setpwent() should imply an automatic endpwent() on the nss side. -- Heiko
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
