> On 31/08/2021 10:56 Felix Zielcke <fziel...@z-51.de> wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, dem 31.08.2021 um 10:33 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > > > > > On 31/08/2021 00:11 Joan Moreau <j...@grosjo.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > There seems to be 2 plugins doing the same thins > > > - https://github.com/slusarz/dovecot-fts-flatcurve/ > > > - https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/ (mine) > > > Both are in the doc of dovecot > > > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/fts/ > > > > > > I am currently working hard to push it to RPM package, and plugin > > > is already approved by ArchLinux and Debian > > > > > > Isn't there double work here ? > > > Thanks > > > JM > > > > If you look closer, you can see they are not exactly duplicates. > > Flatcurve works differently than your plugin. > > > > Aki > > Is there somewhere a direct comparison of them? > I currenty use fts-xapian from Joan without problems. > But what would be the advantages of fts-flatcurve over fts-xapian?
fts_flatcurve does only full word searching, although you can use fts_filters and fts_tokenizers settings to affect stemming and other matching to make it work with plurals and such. Both plugins have their merits. Aki
