Vincent Siveton wrote:
+1
Also, we could update several interfaces in the doc-renderer to handle
2 pdfs implementations: itext and fo.
That's actually the main practical reason for why I want to promote the
fo module now: I can't advance with the pdf plugin with the current form
of DocRenderer and DocumentModel. I'll rewrite some stuff as soon as we
have both on the same level.
-Lukas
Vincent
2007/9/20, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I'd like to promote the fo module from sandbox/doxia to
doxia/doxia/doxia-modules. It has some basic docs and tests, has 0 bugs
:) and it's needed by the (sandbox) pdf plugin (which can already be
used to test it, but beware, it's a bit rough still).
A stage site is here:
http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/doxia-module-fo/
Vote is open for 72 hrs.
+1
-Lukas
