Hi Abhijit,

I recommend you to provide a patch under the trunk and not under alpha
tag. The trunk is Doxia beta-1.

Thanks,

Vincent

2008/5/23, Abhijit Bagri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
>  I am Abhijit and work in a platform team at Yahoo! We recently moved
> documentation of our project from our Twiki web to mvn, primarily so that we
> could maintain our documentation more effectively and keep it in sync with
> rapidly changing feature set of our platform.
>
>  I tried using the twiki module. I found it quite a bit done, but there were
> a bunch of features we needed for us to use it. I have enhanced/modified the
> twiki module for the following features:
>
>  1. Enable doxia macros in twiki-module. The syntax I have chosen for this
> is %MACRO_NAME|param=value|param2=value2%
>  This was most important for the toc macro. A related change which was
> needed is #2
>
>  2. Since toc needed the whole doc source to be supplied, I had to modify
> ByLineSource implementation to have the entire source. Since changing the
> whole line based implementation was taknig too much, I just emulated whole
> source reading and supporting the getLine method in the new implementation.
>
>  3. Enable linking of wiki words.
>
>  Earlier a [[MyWikiWord]] would get likned to ./MyWikiWord. I am not sure
> why it was this way. Some light on this? I needed it to point it to
> ./MyWikiWord.html to be useful. Similarly for linking up wikiwords in
> [[][]].
>
>  4. Enable HTML tags. I saw a JIRA on this. Its not assigned so I guess I
> can put in my patch there
>
>  5. Enabling verbatim and blockquote. verbatim did not seem to work properly
> for me.
>
>  We are currently using a patched version of alpha-9 successfully at Yahoo!
> (for internal usage only). However, We though that the community may benefit
> from this and decided to contribute back.
>
>  I see that the current tag is 11-alpha. I would appreciate if someone could
> let me know progress on these issues. I will create necessary JIRA for this
> and add my patch after that.
>
>  Thanks
>  Abhijit
>
>
>

Reply via email to