Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Some actions items:
> - rename the actual doxia branch to 1.0.x and create a new branch for
> sitetools (and probably for tools) I propose to use the alpha tag code
> to do this. Create a new branch 1.0.x for all doxia projects sounds
> better.

If we still want to have these as separate parts (and IIRC that is what
we want) we need to do this:

1. Rename
http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0-alpha-x/
to
http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0.x/

2. Rename
http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-x/
to
http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0.x/

3. If doxia-tools is used by the current alpha-branches (I don't think
it is) we need to create
http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-tools/branches/doxia-tools-1.0.x/

> - apply new versioning in pom

Yes, either before the release or during release:prepare, for both the
branch and trunk.

> - update jira

I can take care of that.

> What else?

For the 1.0 release I think that covers it.

Shall we divide up the work between us Vincent?
If I do the 1.0 release can you do the 1.1 release?

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Vincent
> 
> 2008/12/13 Vincent Siveton <vincent.sive...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> 2008/12/12 Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org>:
>>> Hi Vincent
>>>
>>> Can we have a quit poll about version numbering. We have had discussions
>>> about this in the past and I'd like to come to a conclusion now that the
>>> release is getting closer.
>>>
>>> The proposal that was made earlier was this:
>>>
>>> 1. Create an Doxia 1.0 release from the current doxia-1.0-alpha-x branch
>> +1
>>
>>> 2. Release the current trunk as version 1.1 (currently labeled as
>>> 1.0-beta-1 in JIRA)
>> +1
>>
>>> One reason for this change would be to get out of the alpha/beta mess.
>> +1
>>
>>> It would also align version numbers nicely with Maven and the Site Plugin.
>> hehe it's about dumb luck :)
>>
>>> We would the have two parallel tracks:
>>>
>>> Track one: Maven 2.0.x + Doxia 1.0.x + Site Plugin 2.0.x
>>>
>>> Track two: Maven 2.1.x + Doxia 1.1.x + Site Plugin 2.1.x
>>>
>>> This also ties in with the Doxia Release Plan [1]
>>>
>>> I will have some time off from work during the holidays and will be able
>>> to help.
>>>
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>> Two releases rather one, good xmas presents!
>>
>> If no objections, I will start to prepare these releases, jump in when
>> you are free.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Vincent
>>
>>> [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan
> 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

Reply via email to