Hi John, I don't care for this. I think we should use the category information in the searches? Also I was thinking we could add a new xml tag for language and so the search can specify which language(s) it caters to. Then your optional installer could use the xml language tag as well instead of having to list out each file individually.
Just my two cents, Brent --- "John W. Bairen, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK Guys here I go with big architecture type change > suggestions. > > Can we begin to break the Search directory up into > subdirectories? I > mean under search there would be a directory for > each search category. > > So the structure would become > > .\searches\Computers\Networking > .\searches\Computers\Programming > > And so on. > > Then the relevant searches would go in the right > directory. > This would have the side effect of being able to > drop the <category> tag > from the search files too. though not necessary. > > The reason is for the optional installer. Currently > EVERY search HAS to > be individually listed in the installer. This is A > LOT of overhead, > especially with new searches getting added > regularly. But if I made an > optional installer that allows you select/deselect > the searches by > category then I could just make the installer write > out (or not write > out) entire directories. Thus the installer would > not need to be edited > just because a new search was created. > > > Thoughts? > > JB > > > John W. Bairen, Jr. > www.bairen.net > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ DQSD-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
