Hi John, > So I just click and tell it to > allow. Now I rarely reboot as I usually just hibernate. So > the little blocking warning isn't a big deal for me. > > But what I want to know, which option is less secure: > clicking and allowing or making the reg change for explorer.exe?
As far as I can tell, clicking and allowing should be the more secure route to take, as it only allows that single page to render, and only for the lifetime of the process rendering it, whereas the registry change is global and persistent for explorer.exe (and, to be fair, for iexplore.exe as well, if you want DQSD working properly). Cheers, Kim ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge. Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;10740251;10262165;m _______________________________________________ DQSD-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
