Personally I think this would be ideal for DQSD since the websites used
in the searches tend to fluctuate, some searches will get broken, and
fixed in CVS, but unless the user happens to be subscribed to the users
list, or unless there is a new DQSD release, he would have no idea of
the fix..
IMO..
Monty
dg wrote:
Hi all,
A quick question for y'all (and I'm not suggesting that this should
block the new build).
How would the group feel about an "unattended" (aka "silent") version
of the installer? I'm new to NSIS, but I had a look at the script last
week and nothing grabbed my attention as being horribly problematic
for an unattended install. I might well be wrong though - is there
anything I should be aware of? Does anyone have any opinions on this?
I would be willing to have a look at modifying the script myself if
there are no objections.
Cheers,
Dave.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
