--- Glenn Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Brent, > > > 1) the script type is more of a pain than > currently > > because you'll have to remember to escape all the > > javascript correctly in the xml > > Can we use CDATA junks to avoid having to escape > script?
Yes, I think so - then you just have to remember the CDATA format :) > > > 2) Re: xml format > > > > Actually that was close to what I had in the initial > version > (http://dqsd.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/dqsd/dqsd/preferences.xml?revision=1.1), > but after I added some <possible_value /> elements > like so [1], it seemed a bit unweildy [2]. Plus I > think it might introduce some problems dealing with > unintentional carriage returns. Not sure though, it > does seem weird to use the element text for > <possible_value /> but not for <option />. Ahh, yes I see your point > And, 'description' > 'display_name', agreed, but how > about 'caption' so that we can use 'description' for > more verbose text describing what the option > is/does. I can see the description being displayed > in a tooltip or detail pane, but the caption being > used for, uhm, well the caption. > > I'd also change 'var_name' to 'var'. Yes, if var_name were changed to var instead of name we could use name instead of description, caption, or display_name. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
