I really think the ball is in Microsoft's court. They should have provided a line item
veto instead of a buckshot protection on/off choice. If we all make enough noise about
it, perhaps they'll soon release a patch to fix that. If not, there's an opportunity
for a 3rd party developer.

--
Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman
> Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 3:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>
> Hi James,
>
> > Thanks for the reply. I know I'm going to feel awkward about
> > making this suggestion since I can't code it up, but... I've
> > got a feeling that the only way to get DQSD working properly
> > under XP SP2 (even taking into account the available registry
> > hack) might be to wrap up (i.e. host) DQSD in a Windows executable.
>
> Yes, I thought about that too, and it does have some appeal (unless you
> count the amount of work involved ;)).
>
> However, doing this would involve re-architecting (if you can use such a
> word for something like DQSD) the entire application.
>
> If I understand things correctly, DQSD currently pulls some tricks to embed
> IE into the task bar, which gives us ample opportunity for skinning using
> HTML and CSS, and to preserve that functionality, we'd have to do the same.
> Explorer.exe would still need to be excluded from local machine lockdown.
>
> Then there's the problem with DQSD needing to execute local content (where
> IExplore.exe needs to be excluded from local machine lockdown) in order to
> display the help window or pop up IE windows or launch searches
> (maximized.htm). We could potentially build another exe for that, but then
> it'd have to look and feel pretty much just like IE.
>
> As if that wasn't bad enough, we'd probably have to put a lot of work and
> energy into making sure our IE stand-in was secure and didn't open up the
> user's machine to anything that IE wouldn't.
>
> > Of course, MS don't seem to have gone so far as to give
> > sample code or suggested code architecture for hosting an
> > HTML-based application!
>
> I don't think it's that hard - everybody's doing it. The real challenge is
> having it executing in a different process, but rendering in the taskbar. I
> don't think you can do that.
>
> Oh well... I'll keep thinking about it, and see if I get any bright ideas.
>
> Cheers,
> Kim
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idP47&alloc_id808&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe visit:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id†01
> ----------------------------------------------------
> This message has been processed by Firetrust Benign.

Reply via email to