On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:12:24 +0200 Lucas Sköldqvist <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 05:54:14PM -0300, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I was thinking in the web browser to include in the next version.. > > and I think the only sane and powerful engine is Seamonkey (apart > > from the well-known web browsers). I wonder, what is required to > > liberate Seamonkey?. (Sorry if I don't remember very well all the > > details at this moment) > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Matias > > We need to change the branding and the addons page at least. Perhaps > tweak/remove some settings and install some plugins by default > (LibreJS, HTTPS Everywhere, etc.). > > If we go with SeaMonkey I suggest we build it without the built-in > mail, html-editor, and other components. > I agree with frusen, my only gripe with sea-monkey is the excess of cruft, I think we should only provide the web browser. libreJS has some problems so we better investigate first, HTTPS everywhere is great. -- Best Regards. Mateus Pinto Rodrigues (mprodrigues) [66679238] free software enthusiast and developer E462 69C4 73EF 91F9 25E2 8249 0F8B 6C54 6667 9238
pgpnPlMFY82Do.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
