On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 5:12 PM DustDFG <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 3:48 PM Antonio Diaz Diaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > DustDFG wrote: > > >>> The unpacking of tde-i18n archive takes long time (in my case ~10 > > >>> minutes). As I know, you prefer to use for tarlz "--solid -9" options > > >>> and I think that you used it with this package. If it is so, I want to > > >>> propose to use for this package other compression options that can > > >>> speed up unpacking without significant damage for archive size > > > > > > As I know, you can find its sources[1][2] at dragora rsync server [3] > > > and mirrors of the rsync server. > > > > > > [1] > > > http://mirror.cedia.org.ec/dragora/current/sources/tde-i18n-20220504_e67bfc8629.tar.lz > > > > Thank you. > > > > I have downloaded the file and it seems that MatÃas is already using optimal > > options to create it: '-9 --bsolid'. You can verify this with the following > > command: > > > > $ lzip -lvv tde-i18n-20220504_e67bfc8629.tar.lz > > dict memb trail uncompressed compressed saved name > > 32 MiB 17 0 1035493376 210839116 79.64% > > tde-i18n-20220504_e67bfc8629.tar.lz > > member data_pos data_size member_pos member_size > > 1 0 67124736 0 8733513 > > 2 67124736 67121664 8733513 17127777 > > 3 134246400 67273728 25861290 12500459 > > 4 201520128 67140608 38361749 7175227 > > 5 268660736 67115008 45536976 10444313 > > 6 335775744 67115520 55981289 28148400 > > 7 402891264 67111424 84129689 21878554 > > 8 470002688 66850304 106008243 9424019 > > 9 536852992 67107840 115432262 12988451 > > 10 603960832 67101696 128420713 11146566 > > 11 671062528 67110912 139567279 24369671 > > 12 738173440 67100160 163936950 6647518 > > 13 805273600 67116032 170584468 6911856 > > 14 872389632 67121152 177496324 15048311 > > 15 939510784 67098624 192544635 10330287 > > 16 1006609408 28882944 202874922 7964150 > > 17 1035492352 1024 210839072 44 > > > > On a dual core machine it takes tarlz 11.2 seconds to list the archive, > > against 19.7 seconds for GNU tar. Almost twice as fast. The same happens > > when extracting to a tmpfs on RAM, 12.1s for tarlz vs 21.6s for GNU tar. > > > > I'm afraid the reason why it takes so long to extract on your machine is > > that it is slow to write so many files to your storage (56745 files and > > directories totalling more than 1 GB). Unless there is some bottleneck in > > tarlz that I don't know about. Please, could you try to extract the archive > > with tarlz and GNU tar and compare the times? Thanks. > > > > Best regards, > > Antonio. > > > > > > Hello Antonio! > > I didn't try to know exact time of extraction but I got strange > results when I tried to get exact time of listing the archive. > > The followinfg results for standart tar: > > $ time tar -t -f ./tde-i18n-20220504_e67bfc8629.tar.lz > > real 0m27.391s > user 0m26.549s > sys 0m1.102s > > The followinfg results for tarlz without -f option: > > $ time tarlz -t ./tde-i18n-20220504_e67bfc8629.tar.lz > > real 56m5.702s > user 0m0.001s > sys 0m0.006s > > I couldn't stand my patience so I interrupted process with CTRL+C > > But the prevoius command with "-f" flag: > > $ time tarlz -t ./tde-i18n-20220504_e67bfc8629.tar.lz > > real 0m11.626s > user 0m34.261s > sys 0m0.510s
I forgot to add -f option to the third command in the message but I ran program with it
