On 02/17/2011 07:37 PM, Robinson, Eric wrote: > Florian, > >> Why wouldn't it be, say, the CFQ scheduler at work and you >> really ought to be using deadline? >> > > I saw a reference to that somewhere, but I think the question may be > beyond my level at this point. How can I tell which is being used
Explained here: http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-latency-tuning.html#s-latency-tuning-deadline-scheduler > and > whether it is the culprit? That's a bit trickier. :) But it's worth trying out and seeing what happens. > Most importantly, in about two hours the old primary will finish its > fsck and will start up and re-join the cluster as the new secondary. I do hope this is a fsck on your root fs, not a fsck on the disconnected DRBD device. Well, actually, what I really hope is that you can soon upgrade that box to use a journaling filesystem. And a recent DRBD. And Pacemaker. :) Cheers, Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
