On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:59 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> Quoting Zev Weiss <[email protected]>:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Ken, Mark -- any further information on the write performance problem, 
>> and/or a solution to it?
>> 
>> I'm running 8.3.7 at the moment, I think I'm going to try updating to 8.3.11 
>> and/or 8.4 and see if it magically fixes anything (unless there are further 
>> suggestions on other things to try).
>> 
>> 
>> Zev
>> 
> I've put together a quick test cluster.  DRBD does well on the initial disk 
> sync.  I just went back and looked at the graphs to make sure it wasn't my 
> imagination.  I'm beginning to think it has something to do with the 
> interaction of DRBD/LVM2/GFS2 that is not happy. I did most of the tweaks I 
> could find and it added up to 50% increase, but going from 1.5M to 2.0M isn't 
> exactly thrilling.
> 
> Ken Lowther
> 

Yeah, I think I've seen decent performance on sync as well, but when it comes 
to actual usage as the backing store of a live filesystem, things go rapidly 
downhill -- I've been seeing about 4MB/s on my system.  Not quite the 2M you're 
seeing, but still pretty unacceptably slow, by an order of magnitude or so.

As for the source of the problem, I don't have GFS2 in the picture on my setup, 
so I think that'd rule out that component (assuming we're looking at the same 
underlying cause).  I may be able to attach some extra drives to my machines 
and create another drbd resource to test with, so I can try e.g. with and 
without LVM between DRBD and the raw block devices and see if that makes a 
difference.

Zev
(I seem to have a bad habit of mistakenly replying to the sender instead of the 
list...sorry about that Ken.)

_______________________________________________
drbd-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user

Reply via email to