2556 So a Master/Slave Configuration would make no difference (without GFS2 ...) ? I assume fencing is required too ...
Or may be using DRBD in standalone mode ? Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 um 09:50 Uhr Von: Digimer <[email protected]> An: "DRBD User" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Betreff: Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD suitable for Fast Failover ? On 28/05/15 02:56 AM, DRBD User wrote: > My goal is to achieve a failover of about 1-2 seconds. Almost impossible to do sanely. Fencing is just not that fast... Add in the overhead of detecting the fault (drbd and corosync), initiating the fence, confirming it succeeded and then cleaning up locks/replaying FS journals, etc... 10 seconds would be impressive. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
