On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:26:45AM +0100, Jean-Daniel Tissot wrote: > <html> > <head> > <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" > http-equiv="Content-Type"> > </head> > <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> > <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli > wrote :<br>
Please stop sending html-only mail. > I used DRBD 9 knowing it is not recommended for production.<br> Hm, there might be some over interpretation, right? IMO all that was said is that if you don't need the additional features of DRBD9 (more nodes, auto-promote, RDMA, resource management with drbdmanage), then stay with drbd 8.4. IMO drbd9 improved a lot since .0, its simply your decision. > Since we are on a production cluster, is it dangerous to switch to > Linbit repository ?<br> Switching the repo isn't. Proxmox drbdmange had very minimal modifications, basically using a different storage plugin as default. We even ship that modification in our repo. The real thing is that the drbdmanage *versions* shipped are very different. Get familiar with the new one, especially the changed startup, try it in some VMs. Know what the implications are if nodes are mission and you try to start the cluster. There are many posts about that already, I don't repeat it here again. > When DRBD 9 will be stable and really usable in production?<br> That's not a serious question, right? When will Linux be stable? Regards, rck _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
