On 11/12/18 3:40 PM, Rene Peinthor wrote: > ... you don't need to explicitly have to set NO_SECURITY ...
...and by the way, the name of that level will almost certainly change whenever we implement more of the security model, because it is not actually correct. The NO_SECURITY level overrides object protection, but does not override certain other security features as the name would suggest. A new name has not been defined yet, but it will probably be something like NO_PROTECTION, NO_OBJ_PROT, or something silimar. We'll keep you posted. br, Robert _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
