On 3/14/19 4:01 PM, kvaps wrote: > And also adds inconvenience for building module every time via dkms. > Some container-based distros may have no dkms at all eg. CoreOS, using > of DRBD9 is quite difficult there.
That's a general problem of how Linux works, since it does not have a stable binary interface for its kernel modules. > Including DRBD9 in kernel-tree may solve all these problems. > Have you any plans for include DRBD9 into kernel tree? As far as I know, that is planned. > Is there any difficulties with that? Depends on what your definition of "difficulties" is. Generally speaking, it will probably take a year or two for it to be prepared, sent upstream, modified according to feedback, then after a number of iterations finally accepted and integrated upstream. It will probably happen eventually, but quite certainly not this year. br, Robert _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
