Hello,
as you all should have noticed the Linux kernel team has this under
development (2.5 and backport patches for 2.4.17+). So I would sharp your
senses, that we should consider this when we do new DRM stuff.
I think there is ongoing discussion in the Mach 64 group (udelay vs sleep)?
As I recall it right there was something in the "old" Mesa source (old voodoo
driver, commented sleep(1000)) to get lower CPU usage.
But I can't find it in the tdfx tree, again.
Regards,
Dieter
--
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
