On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:53:50PM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > Jos Fonseca wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > > Jose Fonseca wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed > > > > > > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a > > > > > > file list of the i810 driver. libGLcore, e.g., is 18 MB..! > > > > > > > > > > What is libGLcore.a? Is that actually used? > > > > > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is responsible for the indirect rendering and is only used is this > > > > circumstance. > > > > > > > > The question is if there have been any changes across Xfree 4.x &/| Mesa > > > > &/| DRI that could lead to incompatibilities... > > > > > > I can't see why there would have been. This stuff doesn't really talk to the > > > DRI or to the DDX modules in any direct way. I don't think it will need to be > > > replaced on downloads. > > > > > Keith, > > > > libGLcore.a is the internal Mesa code that drives indirect GLX. > > > > If anything changes in Mesa, libGLcore.a changes too. > > Yes, but the interfaces to the outside world don't change - the module should > be pretty much self contained... shouldn't it? > True, but a less than ideal situation if you've got an indirect core at Mesa 3.4.x and a direct core at Mesa 4.0.x.
Alan. _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
