On Sonntag, 3. März 2002 18:09:18, Gareth Hughes wrote: > Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Yes, SPECviewperf worked out of the box, GLperf never tried. > > Got SPECviewperf running several times for testing the tdfx driver since > > '2000. > > > > I only changed CDEBUGFLAGS in makefile.linux for better Athlon > > optimization. > > > > CDEBUGFLAGS = -O -mcpu=k6 -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 > > -malign-functions=4 -fschedule -insns2 -fexpensive-optimizations > > Hmmm, I'm not really sure that's legal (in terms of having reportable > results with a binary compiled like that) :-)
He asked about self compiling...;-))) Oh and I had forgotten to mention, that he should have a look into ~viewperf-6.2.1/docs/Linux_readme.html. AMD 1 GHz Athlon II SlotA (0.18µm) MSI MS-6167 Rev 1.0B (AMD 750, Irongate C4, without bypass) 640 MB PC100-2-2-2 SDRAM Voodoo5 5500 AGP DRI CVS trunk (Mesa-4.0.2) Linux 2.4.19-pre2-ac2 (incl. O(1)-scheduler) + preemption + lock-break I use the latest -aa VM stuff, too. It delivers much better throughput. As I asked about latency and preemption before, it should be a design goal for DRI, too. If you ever get your hands on such a system, you will _NEVER_ use Linux without...;-) --- I am under KDE-3.0 beta2, too and it flies!!! Here are my numbers for AWadvs-04: viewperf-6.2.1/AWadvs-04> ../tools/vpost.pl -v awadvs viewperf.log Log file: viewperf.log Advanced Visualizer (AWadvs-04) Viewset ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Weight Frames DList Visual Double Frame Buffer Accumulation # % Per Sec Build ID Buffer R G B A Z Stencil R G B A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 21.00 15.50 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 2 21.00 14.90 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 3 14.00 20.90 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 4 14.00 21.50 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 5 6.00 14.70 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 6 5.00 15.70 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 7 5.00 14.70 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 8 4.00 18.00 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 9 4.00 16.90 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 10 3.00 17.50 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 11 3.00 16.60 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Weighted Geometric Mean = 16.948 Cheers, Dieter _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel