On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:49:20AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:31:46AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Ian Romanick wrote:
> > > > What ends up happening is glXGetProcAddress returns the address of the
> > > > glBegin symbol from my executable (in this case the address of the pointer
> > > > to function) instead of the address of the glBegin symbol in the library.
> > > > Is this behavior to spec?
> > >
> > > Probably the fact that you are declaring a symbol that is "reserved" by OpenGL
> > > invalidates your right to have GL act according to spec. You might get a link
> > > error if you tried to link this program against libGL.so, for instance.
> >
> > So, to put it another way, glXGetProcAddress is working fine, but I'm trying
> > to do something that you're not supposed to do. :)
>
> Well, you're doing something you're not supposed to do & as a result
> glXGetProcAddress isn't working right.
>
> Do you really need to call your symbol glBegin? How about xyzBegin or
> similar?
The most common thing I've seen is to call the indirect function:
glBeginProc
- |Daryll
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
