On Fri, 24 May 2002 18:18:51 +0200
Alexander Stohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good fix Felix.
>
> I do "hate" local function prototypes.
> Its just bad coding style and laziness.
> Further it shows a critical lack of
> knowledge for the header file organisation.
In this case there aren't even any headers involved. The function in
question is static. There is really no point in declaring it local. I'm
almost afraid it was put there on purpose for some obscure reason.
> Just one question:
> Would you (and the XFree86 and the kernel folks)
> allow me to "rework" all your sources at that degree,
I'm a newby. Don't ask me for permission :)
Regards,
Felix
__\|/__ ___ ___ ___
__Tschüß_______\_6 6_/___/__ \___/__ \___/___\___You can do anything,___
_____Felix_______\Ä/\ \_____\ \_____\ \______U___just not everything____
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >o<__/ \___/ \___/ at the same time!
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
