> I'm planing on > having DRISUP_BOTH, DRISUP_BSD, DRISUP_LINUX, DRISUP_NONE > defined for the 3rd element.
I dont like the "both" thing. The design looks for me rather like a bitfild than an enum... so this would be the solution: (DRISUP_BSD | DRISUP_LINUX) a DRISUP_ALL would make more sense, but the cases where it will apply will not be large, if ever existing. > Later something like DRISUPPORTED(bsd,linux,ect...) can be > implemented for more OSes. i am in favour of the basic idea to design a standard way for determining what specific chips a driver is capable of. two platforms means portability is mostly solved and its adoption will rise soon. Regards, Alex. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
