Great work Keith. > What I've done so far is to extend the existing radeon interfaces to accept > & validate the new state required for the r200, and a couple of other minor > changes. This is probably the minimal set of changes to get a working r200 > driver.
It would seem that driver development for the R200 similar to the R100, considering how quickly this driver came out. Is this correct? > A large part of this difference is presumably due to HyperZ - something > that we can't implement in an open driver. Could you please explain why this is, I'd like to know and I'll add it to the documentation, I assume the same holds true for the R100. Do you think a R200_dri_features page (like the one for the R100) would be in order, would you like one? Liam ---- it depends ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
