I'm not sure what you mean by your response. I'm using the code from dri.sf.net. I tried re-applying it after I rebuilt X with the same results. I ended up having to re-build X again to fix it.
Jay > Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:32:13 +0400 > From: Konstantin Lepikhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Dri-devel] Re: R128 Problems - The information you requested > > Hi! > > Sun 29, 15:53:34 -0700, Linus Torvalds([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > On 29 Sep 2002, Jay Phelps wrote: > > > > > > It looks to me like DRI claims to be starting up A-OK. However, glxinfo > > > reports no and gears FPS is as such that it's certainly not using DRI, > > > I'm including my log file for examination. > > > > I had something similar the other week. XFree86.log showed that X had > > enabled DRI fine, but no acceleration worked. Enabling LIBGL_DEBUG showed > > that any GLX app was unable to load the r200_dri.so file, even though > > stracing the binary clearly showed that the open of the file (and mmap) > > succeeded cleanly. R200_DEBUG showed absolutely nothing. > > > > Doing a "make clean + make World" fixed it for me - there's probably > > something wrong with the dependencies in some makefile. > > > > Linus > Hmm...What about binaries from dri.sf.net? Users who using it don't use > cvs :) Maybe stop prducing "bad" code until source is being fixed? > > -- > WBR, Konstantin > > ZAO ELKATEL Network/Security assistant > -------------------------------------------------------- > ...The information is like the bank... (c) EC8OR > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
