Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2002 10:32 schrieb Christopher L. Estep:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dieter Nützel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:53 PM
[-]
> > Here's the triumphant log attached as proof:
>
> [-]
>
> > (II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled
> > (II) RADEON(0): Using hardware cursor (scanline 1024)
> > (II) RADEON(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1280 x 7165
> > (II) RADEON(0): X context handle = 0x00000001
> > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler
> > (II) RADEON(0): [DRI] installation complete
> > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Added 32 65536 byte vertex/indirect buffers
> > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Mapped 32 vertex/indirect buffers
> > (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled
>
> [-]
>
> Have you verified with an app (gears)?
> How fast was it?
>
> 1017 fps, which is not *software* by any means. That was with an
> *AGPMode* of 2. I'm kicking it north to 4 (this *is* an AGP 4X card and
> mobo) and seeing what's next.
AGPMode shouldn't do much for this test. But 1017 fps looks like hardware.
It would be much more useful if you let us know which hardware (yes, r200) but
CPU, RAM do you have. Then 1017 fps didn't look so fast for a r200 card.
Here I get ~2393 fps (AGPMode 4) on a 1280x1024x24 desktop.
dual Athlon MP 1900+ (but Mesa is single threaded, you know)
1 GB DDR SDRAM 266, CL2
r200, Powered by ATI
2.5.41-ac2
Cheers,
Dieter
PS A little bit "trimming" of your posts would be helpful ;-)
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
