On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:49:48PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:17:29AM +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > And which host.def is this a patch against ? It does not match the trunk's > > versions at all. For a start there is no definition of LinuxDistribution > > in the trunks host.def file. > > > > You shouldn't need OS level patches like this at the host.def level. > > > > Please post more details on the errors that you are getting during building > > of the trunk. > > Ah, sorry. Going back a week or two in memory to when I posted it to > sourceforge, I think I took it off a static tarfile, which I took at the > time to be the "stable" distribution or some such. > > > As far as "not needing OS level patches at the host.def level"... > > Some features, namely, Glide3, seem to be only valid for particular OSes, > so it would have to be an OS level patch. As far as WHERE it goes, > please suggest/patch whereever you find it to be most appropriate. I'm just > reporting what I needed to get the stuff to initially configure, and so > forth. HasGlide3 is set to NO by default and only enabled on Linux with an i386 or Alpha architecture.
> I made a quick run at a patch, and have moved on to other things. > For those who have a deeper understanding of the config files, please > do the right thing whereever it is now appropriate. Whereever you got the sources from, this patch is no longer necessary if you use the DRI trunk. But if you do get build problems, please post again, I'd be glad to help. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
