On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 04:23, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> Hey folks,
> 
>       I'm trying to find out the branch to use for NetBSD.  I know that
> Eric Anholt posted it here in the not-too-distant past, but I can't seem
> to find the e-mail from him anywhere (and the search mechanism on
> sourceforge doesn't seem to be working).
> 
>       Also, would it be possible to actually update:
> 
> http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/cvs.html
> 
>       For example, the r200-0-1, s3virge-0-0-1, tdfx-2-1, and
> gamma-2-0-0 branches can probably all be moved from the "Current" section
> to the "Old" section.  I think the bsd-3-0-0 branch can as well.  And the
> newest mesa and texmem branches should be listed under "Current".
> 
> Adam

I thought Erik Reid would be making some sort of announcement, but here
it is: bsd-4-0-0-branch compiles on NetBSD-current as LKMs (I don't know
the status of older releases), and I've successfully used it for
glxgears with r200, r100, r128, and g400.  Same build/install process as
FreeBSD, then modload /usr/lkm/<card>.o, then start X.  I was trying to
get module loading automatically by the X Server, but for some reason it
was causing hanging.

Also note: if you cvs update to bsd-4-0-0-branch from an already-built
trunk, mesa compiling will fail because it tries to build/depend on some
of the dead links that didn't get removed (Mesa uses globbing for some
filenames I think).

Once I get some time I'll merge it to trunk.

-- 
Eric Anholt                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]          
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/         [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to