On 15 Feb 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:11, Leif Delgass wrote: 
> > I've opened a new mach64 branch (mach64-0-0-6-branch), which has now been
> > updated from the current DRI trunk with X 4.2.99.2 and Mesa 5.x.  I've
> > updated the mach64 driver to Mesa 5 based on the changes to the Rage 128
> > driver.  Testing hasn't shown any problems so far.
> > 
> > I haven't adapted the mach64 drm to the os-independence changes yet.  I
> > could start this, but we are going to need a generic replacement for the
> > pci_alloc_consistent Linux interface.  I think it's probably best to hold 
> > off on making that switch, pending the changes Jose has proposed:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08243.html
> > 
> > In the meantime, the drm can still be compiled and used from the old linux
> > kernel directory like the other drivers which have yet to be converted.
> >   
> > I'd recommend that people using the mach64-0-0-5-branch from CVS update to
> > this new branch and report any regressions or new bugs to the list.  
> > Sometime in the next few weeks, I'll also be updating the GATOS Xvideo
> > patch available at the site in my sig.  Since the GATOS head is now based
> > on current XFree86 cvs, I may not have a new patch until 4.3.0 is released
> > and changes get propagated back to the DRI and GATOS trees.
> 
> I've been working on this locally a little, but haven't tackled the
> pci_alloc_consistent in a proper manner yet (the corresponding interface
> for us is bus_dma, which I am just beginning to understand while working
> on ati_pcigart.h/drm_scatter.h conversion).
> 
> If you would approve of me moving the mach64 files to shared/drm/kernel,
> I could at least work on things incrementally (much of this stuff is
> mechanical changes), and then hopefully provide something pretty to
> review for pci_alloc_consistent.

As long as the Linux build still works, that's fine by me.  If you want to 
create the makefile links, move it to shared, and work on macro-izing the 
ioctls and whatnot, go for it.  I was going to do this eventually, but if 
you're eager to get started, that's great.  Of course, this will all have 
to happen in the mach64-0-0-6-branch for now, until we get the DRM 
interface/security changes done.

-- 
Leif Delgass 
http://www.retinalburn.net




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to