On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 04:56, Eric Anholt wrote: > - What should the DRM do if the minor number for either DI or DD > interface is greater than the DRM knows about?
Return DRM_ERR( EINVAL ) ? > - Do we want to put some reserved fields in the SET_VERSION ioctl in > case we want to extend it in some manner in the future? The versioning could be used to extend it? :) > - Should the libdri minor version be bumped for the new > DRICreatePCIBusID function? I think so. > Is using xf86LoaderCheckSymbol the way to see if it's available, That or the minor version I guess, whichever is more convenient. > and does it need to be in the symbol lists for the drivers? Yes, or it will probably be reported as unresolved when the dri module isn't loaded. > - I would like to move xf86drm.c to shared/drm/ (it's a shared file > anyway). [...] > - drm.h should probably get re-merged and put into shared/ Sounds good. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
