On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 23:49, Ian Romanick wrote: 
> I added Keith's proposed struct with int64_t as the value, and I added 
> '#include <inttypes.h>' to xf86drmCompat.c.  Everything compiled fine.

Easy enough. :)

I've updated
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-memory-transition.diff,
addressing the feedback I've received so far - thanks, more appreciated
as always. In particular, Eric will need to double check this for the
BSDs; I don't know what to define DRM_PUT_USER_UNCHECKED() to, and the
filp_priv handling may still be wrong.


>   Are we intending to maintain the old client-side drivers forever?  I 
> seem to remember there being problems with the really old client-side 
> drivers and the newer kernel modules anyway.

FWIW (not much :), I'm not aware of such problems. Do you mean the
opposite problems of newer radeon 3D drivers with older DRMs?


-- 
Earthling Michel DÃnzer   \  Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast  \     http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to