On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 18:43, Josà Fonseca wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:02:17PM -0500, Christopher Gleba wrote: > > > > It turns out that I mis-configured lilo and when I rebooted a kernel > > with the software suspend patch was being booted rather then a clean one > > as I had thought (and I *knew* that swsusp causes problems with video > > cards). When I booted with a clean kernel, mach64 drm worked fine (and > > I got 270fps with glxgears rather then the ususal 110fps :)).
[...] > > Nonetheless, I've included the debug output, the agpgart source with the > > software suspend patch added as well as without it and the software > > suspend patch itself for both the list archives in case anyone else runs > > into this problem. Also, I know that 2.6.0+ uses software suspend, so > > the debugging information below may help when it comes time for a 2.6 > > port. > > Thanks for the info. > > I don't know whose's fault is that sw suspend doesn't work with mach64 > dri (it could be sw suspend patch, mach64 drm, or the agpgart). I know > that radeon driver has suspend/resume support, but I think it's for > hardware suspend. No, it's also for software suspend (Charl wrote it to be able to use that), but it only has an effect for a suspend/resume cycle while the server is running; it's weird that the mere fact that the kernel is patched for software suspend should have an effect on DRI initialisation. -- Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
