I just went through the hardware I have on FreeBSD trying the newmesa DRI, testing with glxgears and tuxracer, and the mesa demos reflect, gloss, and tunnel.
The r200 system had 4.3.99.15 server, 4.3.0 libGL, and newmesa GL drivers. 1600x1200x16 screen. The other tests were done on another system with a 4.3.99.15 server (except for MGA, which was done with 4.3.0 server) newmesa libGL (after seeing the issues listed using 4.3.0 libGL and wanting to be sure), and newmesa GL drivers. 640x480x16 screen. I have doubts about the glide I was using for the v5, but I hope to get a new glide soon (just need to package it up, which has defeated me many times in the past). Results: r200: minor flickering of tree textures r100: tuxracer's ground broken r128, SiS, MGA: tuxracer's ice patches are very ugly (more than before) SiS: gloss looks very different -- not glossy? SiS: reflect broken v5: texturing broken in tuxracer, tunnel, gloss reflect's visual wasn't available on r128 and MGA, perhaps due to using depth 16. Hardware: r200: Radeon QL 8500 r100: Radeon QW 7500 SiS: SiS 305 PCI r128: Rage 128 Pro PF (iirc) MGA: MGA G400 v5: Voodoo5 5500 P.S. Felix, I still have testing that r128 diff on my TODO, sorry for not trying it yet. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
