Keith Whitwell wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:


What I'd really like to be able to do now is build the dri drivers directly out of the Mesa tree.



Definately. Slate that up for 6.1, I'll certainly work on that issue.


It's not too hard - I had it working on the embedded branch a while ago.

In general, the Mesa make system could use a little modernization and spring cleaning. It'd be nice to see what improvements could be made with minimal or no additional toolchain requirements.

Again - the embedded branch has/had a nice build system, although one that relied (very minimally) on GNU make.

If we required GNU make for compiling Mesa, that wouldn't be too terrible. The Chromium project uses GNU make and it seems to be working fine and accepted.


I agree that some spring cleaning is in order.

-Brian



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to