So should we just work on getting everything running on newtree then and not worry about the security issues for now?
-James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Whitwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "José Fonseca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "James Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dave Airlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:53 AM Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 and new tree > José Fonseca wrote: > > If it's OK to sacrifice some speed in order to make the mach64 driver > > secure and elegible to go the the trubk then there is quite a simple > > solution: disable DMA by default (using the MMIO pseudo-DMA). Users still > > have the option to force DMA in XF86Config if they so wish. > > > > I think this would make most people happy, as users no longer had to > > download snapshots, and for the developers it would be easier too as no > > further HEAD merges would be necessary. > > This seems like a good way forward. > > Keith > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > -- > _______________________________________________ > Dri-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
