On Gwe, 2004-02-13 at 11:31, Thomas Biege wrote: > Hi, > one of our developers mentioned that depth->n can be negative. > > I didn't checked the whole code but even if depth->n is unsigned, > count is signed and can be negative by using a depth->n > INT_MAX. > > Is this a real problem or do we just hunt ghosts here?
I can't see how to exploit it offhand but its certainly soemthing that wants a better fix rolling into the next updates. I'm embarrassed I missed something so obvious ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
