> > Thanks again for your work on this Dave. > > BTW, what's your (and everyone's, for that matter) opinion on > video-reset and the libsysfs copy being in the drm module? I still don't > see the point of the former being there, much less the latter.
I think libsysfs should be killed out of the drm tree at least, it isn't being developed by us, so if you want to use video-reset get your own copy, I've no major issues with video-reset in there, I would like to see it use drm.h from the actual DRM not having its own private copy, but I've also no objections to seeing it moved to is own top-level along with xc and drm as it isn't really drm centric, it is just an app that uses it .. I think Jon is back from his hols so we should work this out soon, not sure how long Eric is still out for, with every change I make in the DRM I worry I'm going to break BSD :-) What I'd like to do now is let the patches filter into the Linux Kernel and unless a change is majorly necessary let the DRM CVS rest for a week or so until we are all synced up .. then we can go again!!, the __user stuff needs to be put in and I know Jon has a big bunch of changes he wants to propose... Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
