On Monday 19 April 2004 20:08, Michel DÃnzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 02:13, ajax wrote:
> > All drivers except savage emit the "Direct rendering disabled" message as
> > an informational message; savage makes it an error. Technically it's not
> > an error, since the server can continue, but it should probably be at
> > least a warning. This would make troubleshooting easier, because users
> > know to look for lines with a (WW) or (EE) on them.
> >
> > Attached patch makes this message a warning across all drivers.
>
> IMHO it should only be a warning if it was intended to be enabled in the
> first place.
I tend to agree. I don't think there's any list of requested modules
maintained anywhere. tdfx does xf86LoaderCheckSymbol("DRIQueryVersion") to
see if libdri.a loaded though, which is probably good enough; if the check
fails the message can be degraded to an X_INFO. Sound reasonable?
> PS: Is anyone opposed to providing this guy (do you have a real name? :)
> with CVS write access?
Indeed I do, sorry about that.
- ajax
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
