--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since it defines the interface to libdrm.a, I had always just assumed
> it would go where the libdrm.a source was.  That seems the most
> logical place to me.  However, I would be open to changing its name.

I updated xf86drm.c to match the one in dri_client (which is the same
as the one in the dri tree).

I'm compiling in the libdrm c files directly into miniglx. If you add a
Makefile to make libdrm.a I can switch miniglx to use it.

=====
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to