David D. Hagood wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Interesting but unlikely to be related to drm changes, first and
...
I hope this thread doesn't start some misconception that these changes
are breaking an existing binary interface - because one doesn't
exist! Though this is precisely my argument against introducing one
in the form of a split core/subdriver model for DRM.
That was not my intention, rather my intention was to demonstrate that,
regardless of DRM changes, the ATI proprietary driver is broken now -
therefor concern about DRM changes breaking it are currently irrelevant.
OK fair enough. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
