On Llu, 2004-09-20 at 18:38, Adam Jackson wrote: > Inclusion is not conversion, in this case. All the copyright statements in > the DRM source (excluding your recent commit) specify BSD licenses. If the > bug-fixers wanted their changes to apply under the GPL they should have > indicated that by changing the copyright statement at the top of the file.
Some of the pure Linux code is clearly derivative of existing GPL code. I personally don't see the issue for platform specific code that isn't meant to be and won't be portable. Providing that code is also clearly marked. Is there a reason however for not starting from the X code for doing this management ? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
