On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 18:15, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > One thing I noticed in the process: r200Flush() unconditionally calls > r200EmitState(). Is this really necessary? I was assuming that glFlush() > could be a noop when it's not preceded by any rendering commands.
While I suspect this would be legal, note that r200Flush is called from FIREVERTICES, so that emit state that's happening is probably necessary. I had noted this with r200Clear, which depends on state being (semi-?) current at the time of the clear ioctl, and FIREVERTICES and the racefixes should guarantee that. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
