On Thursday 07 October 2004 00:43, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:39:23 -0300, Paulo R. Dallan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 October 2004 09:58, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:40:17 -0300, Paulo R. Dallan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 05 October 2004 19:56, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > > > Use ldd to check glxgears and make sure it's using the right libGL. > > > come the output with ldd of glxinfo. > > > > ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/glxgears gives me: > > > > libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x4002c000) > > libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x400a6000) > > libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x400b4000) > > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4017c000) > > libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x401ce000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x401f0000) > > libXxf86vm.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x4031f000) > > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40324000) > > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > > > > Should this be the expected libraries (especially libGL)? > > compare the output of ldd /path/to/glxinfo to this. usually libGL is > in /usr/X11R6/lib/. perhaps you have multiple versions floating > around. >
Hi Alex, thank you for the reply. ldd /usr/X11R6/glxinfo gives me the exactly same output as the one above... Also checked /usr/lib/libGL.so.1, which I discovered is only a link to /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 ... so, probably this is not the case... Any other tips? Best regards! Paulo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
