On Friday 08 October 2004 08:08, Felix Kühling wrote: > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 05:37:30 -0300 > > "Paulo R. Dallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:57, Paulo R. Dallan wrote: > > > On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:43, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > Paulo R. Dallan wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:37, Felix Kühling wrote: > > > > >>On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 19:04:02 -0300 > > > > >>"Paulo R. Dallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > Try LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose to get some diagnostic messages. Let us know if > ldconfig fixes it. If it's still using the wrong drivers make sure > LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH is set correctly and exported by the shell (depending > which method you chose to install the 3D driver). YES! It solved - did all over again from scratch, but now with the "ldconfig" in the middle of the compiling/building process (what I hadn't done before). It seems it did work! Now both "glxgears -info" and "glxinfo" give me "Mesa DRI R200 20041007 AGP 4x x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE TCL" as the OpenGL renderer and "1.3 Mesa 6.3" as the version string (of course, "glxinfo" also gives me "direct rendering: *Yes*", as it was before). I'm getting around 1200 fps on glxgears now (16bpp, 1024x768) !!! And around 560 fps when using 24 bpp, 1024x768 (is this what I should expect for this depth?) Thank you *VERY* much Felix and thanks to all who helped! Best regards! Paulo BTW: I've been making some testing with the other radeon drivers available, especially to check if the problem I had could be a problem with with the agpgart or some issue with the via kt400 chipset (my bios has the AGP 8X locked, can't change the settings there); With the ati proprietary driver, I get around 650 fps at 24 bpp & 800x600 (I can only use the depth 24bpp there - can't use 16 bpp - because the xserver does not accepts it and crashes - *and* can only run it in 800x600(!!!), because that &#$*% driver keeps disrespecting the monitor horizontal and vertical ranges configured/informed in xorg.conf when in 1024x768 mode. lol. Also tried to test the xig driver, but it does not support the via kt400 chipset. Great the problem seems to have been solved (or at least considerably diminished!). Best regards! Paulo <snip> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
