On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:53 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:42PM +0000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>  > 
>  > >  >
>  > >  > I might get time to do a code review, my main worry is that all the
>  > >  > problems reported with those patches in -mm made it into the patchset 
> that
>  > >  > went into Linus.. mainly things like forgetting to memset certain
>  > >  > structures to 0 and sillies like that...
>  > >
>  > > I saw one report where the recent drm security hole fix broke dri
>  > > for one user.  Whilst it seems an isolated incident, could this have
>  > > more impact than we first realised ?
>  > 
>  > the radeon security changes? I've gotten no bad feedback on those neither
>  > has dri-devel, so I've assumed they were all fine (usually radeon bug
>  > reports get back fairly quickly as everyone has one ..),
>  > 
>  > the multi-bridge stuff is definitely broken as I've seen radeon and r128
>  > reports on it .. and it looks most like 2.6.11-bk2 broke things and I
>  > haven't merged anything until -bk7 ...
> 
> Wait, -bk2 broke things ?   The big agp changes went into -bk3,
> so this seems odd.
> 

To clarify. 2.6.11-bk2 is working fine. It broke with 2.6.11-bk3, where
IIRC a drm update was made.

Disabling DRI in X and/or DRM in the kernel prevents X from locking the
machine.

>               Dave
> 

Cheers,

Andrew



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to